• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • Bugatti Rimac Signs U.S. Distribution Pact with VW
  • Tentative Settlement Ends Ford Strike Threat in Canada
  • NHTSA Revives Ford Focus Recall Investigation
  • Unifor, Ford Agree to Contract Extension
  • Volkswagen Reveals Third-Generation Tiguan
  • Minivans Aren’t as Safe as You Think, Study Claims
  • Everyone Wants to Talk to Elon
  • EV Growth to Accelerate as Price Parity Approaches
  • The Rearview Mirror: Not General Motors' Cup of Tea
  • Subaru Considering Indiana Plant for EVs
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
      • Feeder
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: The 2024 BMW i7 xDrive60
    • A Week With: 2024 Alfa Romeo Tonale Veloce AWD
    • A Week With: 2023 Toyota Camry XSE Hybrid
    • A Week With: 2024 Subaru Impreza RS
    • A Week With: 2023 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 Desert Boss
    • First Drive: 2024 Polestar 2
    • A Week With: 2024 Mercedes-Benz GLE 450 4Matic
    • A Week With: 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo
    • A Week With: 2023 Toyota Prius Prime
    • A Week With: The 2023 BMW 330e xDrive
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automakers > The Rearview Mirror: Triumph of the Bean Counters

        The Rearview Mirror: Triumph of the Bean Counters

        In 1982, the J-Cars were emblematic of everything that was wrong with GM.

        Larry Printz
        Larry Printz , Assistant Managing Editor
        May 27, 2023
        1983 Chevrolet Cavalier

        This week in 1982, General Motors introduces the J-Cars, aka the Chevrolet Cavalier, Pontiac J2000, Oldsmobile Firenza, Buick Skyhawk and Cadillac Cimarron — the first cars ever designed by GM to be shared across all of its divisions.

        But GM’s first subcompact front-wheel-drive automobiles were emblematic of deep problems at the world’s largest automaker, ones that would eventually lead to its bankruptcy.

        But like all such stories, the real beginning of the J-Cars can be traced back to 1956.

        Too successful

        It’s 1956, and General Motors holds a 50% U.S. market share, manufacturing one of every two cars sold in America. When Henry Ford commanded 60% the U.S. market in 1921, there were dozens of American automakers.

        1983 Oldsmobile Firenza

        Even by the end of World War II, there were 10 major carmakers. But within a decade, there five with GM, Ford and Chrysler accounting for 94% of sales. That was the year that the idea of dismantling General Motors first entered the mind of Stanley Barns, an assistant attorney general with the U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust division. Years would pass while the case was assembled, but by 1967, a draft lawsuit alleging GM of breaking antitrust rules was published by The Wall Street Journal. 

        One thought was to break off Chevrolet, which accounted for roughly half of GM’s sales. But by then each division’s manufacturing had been amalgamated into General Motors Assembly Division, or GMAD, making any breakup of the company impossible as splitting off Chevrolet left it without any manufacturing. 

        Ultimately, GM was not broken up, and GM’s market share of the American car market rose to 62.6% by 1980. 

        Trouble at the top

        1983 Buick Skyhawk

        Ultimately, the rise of GMAD also coincided with the dominance of bean counters at GM, passionless men who cared about profits, not cars. Certainly that wasn’t the case of longstanding Chairman Alfred Sloan, who carefully led the construction of a price ladder of brands that started with Chevrolet, and got rose through Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick, topping off with Cadillac.

        But Sloan, made a crucial mistake after stepping down as Chairman of General Motors in 1956, backing Fred Donner for the top job at General Motors in 1958 rather than GM’s President and CEO Harlow Curtice. 

        Donner was a heartless financial specialist who knew little about cars, having spent his career in GM’s New York City-based financial office. Under Donner, GM increased the number of parts shared across GM divisions, as this reduced costs. Slowly, the differences that had once distinguished a Pontiac from a Buick vanished. Donner didn’t understand that these differences mattered to customers. 

        1983 Cadillac Cimarron’s cabin was nearly identical to the Cavalier.

        As the bean counters continued to run GM, they centralized product development under platform teams, taking the responsibility away from its divisions. Increasingly, those at the top dictated sharing platforms and outer sheetmetal, with little to differentiate the different cars aside from the grille, taillamps and badges. 

        Then, in 1977, GM’s Vice President of Design, Bill Mitchell, retired. He was replaced by Irv Rybicki, whose talent was administration, and whose gentle nature was the antithesis of Mitchell’s. Under Rybicki, GM Design atrophied as design became subservient to engineering and manufacturing — something never true at GM.

        A Design Dud

        Bean counters loved badge engineering, as it proved profitable. It reached its peak in 1982, when GM introduced the midsize A-Body cars, the internal designation for the Chevrolet Celebrity, Pontiac 6000, Oldsmobile Cutlass Cierra and Buick Century, which Fortune magazine lined up for a cover shot. While GM had been shared platforms and bodies since 1932, it had never been so glaringly obvious. And it would followed by the most egregious example: the subcompact J-cars, the first time that GM used the same car for all five divisions. 

        By 1983, GM cars form different brands looked identical apart from badges.

        Arriving as the Chevrolet Cavalier, Pontiac J2000 (later the Sunbird), Oldsmobile Firenza, Buick Skyhawk and Cadillac Cimarron, they were meant to challenge the rising tide of small, affordable, reliable Japanese cars. But the 88-horsepower 1.8-liter 4 cylinder was underpowered compared to its competitors.

        It’s not that GM didn’t have alternatives, they did. One was an overhead-cam mill built by Opel. But Chevrolet engineers designed their own overhead-valve engine, which proved less expensive to build. They also reused parts from the larger X-Cars, aka the Chevrolet Citation, Pontiac Phoenix, Oldsmobile Omega and Buick Skylark. But because they were engineered for a larger car, the parts added needless weight, exacerbating its lack of power. It took a painful 14 seconds to run 0-60 mph. 

        Worse, they were overpriced. At a time when a Honda Civic started at $5,154 and the Toyota Corolla started at $5,448, the Chevrolet Cavalier started at $6,966. And upon it launch, GM built fully loaded versions, making a Chevrolet Cavalier some $2,500 more than a comparable Honda Accord. Needless to say, the Oldsmobile, Buick and Cadillac J-Cars were slow sellers. 

        But what’s worse is what the cars did to GM’s brand equity. Why would anyone buy a Cadillac when it was identical to a Chevrolet with the exception of its badge? 

        It would take more badge-engineering, and a couple decades of inept decisions made mostly by bean counters to push GM into bankruptcy.

        And while Chevrolet sold many Cavaliers and Pontiac the same with J2000s, one wonders how much their poor engineering led customers to buy a Honda or Toyota for their next car. 

        Given that GM’s 2022 market share is 17%, you know the answer.

        How to Care for Your Car

        Cheap Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice

        Best Extended Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice
        Recently Published

        Bugatti Rimac Signs U.S. Distribution Pact with VW

        Yesterday
        Unifor after Ford deal 2023

        Tentative Settlement Ends Ford Strike Threat in Canada

        Yesterday

        NHTSA Revives Ford Focus Recall Investigation

        Yesterday

        3 responses to “The Rearview Mirror: Triumph of the Bean Counters”

        1. Edmund Meurer says:
          May 28, 2023 at 9:26 am

          Great story on the cascade of missteps at GM. Sadly, the insidious nature of accounting in automotive manufacturing may still apply. My understanding is that build quality is at its best when a new model is launched, so that the all-important JD Power award is received. Then the bean counters go to work, reducing cost at the expense of reliability. Remember the ignition switch fiasco?

          Reply
          1. Norm T says:
            June 4, 2023 at 5:36 pm

            “…Chevrolet commissioned independent research company Ipsos to conduct a survey. The details specify that reliability is defined as “the percentage of vehicle owners who reported they have not repaired or replaced any vehicle components in the past 12 months (excluding fluids, filters and those related to accident/collision).”…

            “…The survey sent out 840,979 letters to 2015 model-year vehicle owners, with time in service starting December 2014 through June 2015. Overall, Ipsos received 48,679 responses from Acura, Audi, BMW, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Ford, GMC, Honda, Hyundai, Infiniti, Jaguar, Jeep, Kia, Land Rover, Lexus, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mini, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Ram, Subaru, Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo owners. Full details on the survey can be found online….” Autoblog.com 

            Reply
        2. Jim says:
          May 30, 2023 at 6:30 am

          Unfortunately, Ford and Chrysler followed the leader.

          Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2023
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: