{"id":30294,"date":"2010-09-15T08:27:13","date_gmt":"2010-09-15T12:27:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thedetroitbureau.com\/?p=30294"},"modified":"2010-09-15T09:10:30","modified_gmt":"2010-09-15T13:10:30","slug":"delphi-pension-dust-up-under-federal-investigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/2010\/09\/delphi-pension-dust-up-under-federal-investigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Delphi Pension Dust-Up Under Federal Investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Former Delphi CEO Steve Miller initially promised to keep both blue- and white-collar pension programs once he got the partsmaker out of Chapter 11.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

A new federal investigation is underway, looking at whether undue political influence ultimately cost thousands of Delphi retirees a large chunk of their pensions.<\/p>\n

An independent counsel has been brought in to review a controversial decision by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp., or PBGC, to assume control of the Delphi Corp. salaried pension program as the supplier finally emerged from its long run through bankruptcy.<\/p>\n

Neil M. Barofsky, a special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, said, in a letter to a New York congressman, that his office would examine whether officials from the Treasury Department\u2019s automotive task force — or the White House — pressured General Motors to protect the pensions of Delphi\u2019s blue collar workers, while the PBGC slashed the pensions of salaried employees.<\/p>\n

Barofsky said his office would try to determine whether political considerations played any role in the decisions, \u201cfavoring hourly over salaried retirees.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\/about\/subscribe\"<\/a>
Breaking News@<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

There’s no question there were a lot of vested parties desperately hoping to drag Delphi out of its Chapter 11 quagmire, last year, the longest any major industrial company had ever been caught in the bankruptcy process.<\/p>\n

Last year’s PBGC takeover of the Delphi salaried fund translated into steep cuts in benefits, ranging from 30% to 70% for all of Delphi\u2019s salaried retirees, who also lost their health-care coverage.\u00a0 Delphi\u2019s former white-collar employees have gone to court in an effort to restore the pensions.<\/p>\n

Up until now, the position of General Motors , which spun-off Delphi more than a decade ago, has been that while many of the retirees originally had been GM employees,\u00a0 the salaried pension fund for them was fully-funded when it was handed over to Delphi in 1999.<\/p>\n

What happened to the salaried pension program after that, the carmaker says, was not GM\u2019s responsibility.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, Delphi\u2019s hourly pension fund was in a somewhat different position. Responsibility for blue-collar pensions was shared by Delphi and GM because of very specific language in the agreement the automaker signed with the UAW, GM officials have emphasized.<\/p>\n

One year before the PBGC swooped in and took over the salaried pension fund, Delphi\u2019s board of directors had issued a statement insisting that the bankrupt company was prepared to honor all of its pension commitments.\u00a0 Why that changed last year is the question at the heart of the independent counsel\u2019s new investigation.<\/p>\n

It was pretty clear at the time that statement was made, in May, 2008, with\u00a0George W. Bush still in the White House, that the PBGC was very concerned about the overall health of\u00a0the Delphi pension plans and feared they could implode.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile Senator Carl Levin (D-Mi.)has asked Daniel Akerson, GM\u2019s new chief executive officer, to review the decision not to cover the pension benefits of some Delphi retirees and \u201cto consider bringing all interested parties to the table in an effort to bring a fair and equitable resolution to this situation.\u201d<\/p>\n

GM has not yet responded publicly to Levin\u2019s letter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A new federal investigation is underway, looking at whether undue political influence ultimately cost thousands of Delphi retirees a large chunk of their pensions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20009,"featured_media":13300,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"make":[],"post-state":[],"category_old":[151],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30294"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20009"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30294\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30294"},{"taxonomy":"make","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/make?post=30294"},{"taxonomy":"post-state","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-state?post=30294"},{"taxonomy":"category_old","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/category_old?post=30294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}