{"id":123460,"date":"2018-02-14T17:09:15","date_gmt":"2018-02-14T22:09:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thedetroitbureau.com\/?p=123460"},"modified":"2018-02-14T17:10:59","modified_gmt":"2018-02-14T22:10:59","slug":"dysons-ev-efforts-following-a-familiar-path","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/2018\/02\/dysons-ev-efforts-following-a-familiar-path\/","title":{"rendered":"Dyson’s EV Efforts Following a Familiar Path"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
James Dyson confirmed plans to produce an electric vehicle by 2020.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Stop me if you\u2019ve heard this one: a quirky entrepreneur decides to get into the automotive business by developing an electric vehicle, even though he has no real experience in that arena. The grand plan calls for three vehicles to anchor the company.<\/p>\n

Sound familiar?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Stay Plugged In!<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Yes. But it\u2019s not Elon Musk and Tesla, but rather James Dyson, the famous inventor of the Dyson vacuum and many other products. Dyson recently revealed plans to produce an EV using a solid state batteries rather than the lithium ion panels currently used by automakers.<\/p>\n

The first car, which Dyson revealed was coming late last year, is tracking to arrive before 2020. The limited-edition model, which will be about 10,000 units, will be premium-priced vehicle, although not a sports, Dyson said earlier. It will essentially provide the company with a blueprint for how to make the other two models, according to Financial Times.<\/p>\n

(Dyson blowing into EV car segment like a cyclone. <\/em>Click Here<\/a><\/span>for the story.)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
A new solid state battery cell offers a wealth of advantages over the current lithium ion technology.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Again, sound familiar? The next two models, which will have more mass-market appeal and pricing, will follow.<\/p>\n

In reality the big change is the move from solid state batteries, which are view as next leap forward in battery technology, back to lithium ion power packs. Another source, according to AutoCar.com, says solid states will be used in the next two vehicles.<\/p>\n

While another eclectic entrepreneur jumping into the auto industry is an interesting story, Dyson\u2019s plans to use solid state batteries would have been a big differentiator for any vehicle the start-up company developed.<\/p>\n

Solid-state battery packs have a higher energy density and\u00a0are quicker to charge than liquid cells, cooler while operating and potentially more powerful. Toyota is the only manufacturer with firm plans to introduce the technology in the coming decade, while Porsche has hinted that solid-state EVs\u00a0are in its product plans. BMW has also partnered with a solid-state battery company in its effort to adopt the technology.<\/p>\n

There was good reason to believe that Dyson planned to make good on that point as he\u2019d hired Anne Marie Sastry, purchasing her battery company, Sakit3, which was developing new battery technologies, including the solid state versions for different uses.<\/p>\n

However, Sastry is no longer with Dyson\u2019s company, according to a spokesperson, leaving the program in limbo, at least in terms of a timeline for producing a viable solid-state battery for the burgeoning automaker.<\/p>\n

(<\/em>Click Here<\/a><\/span> for more about the push for solid state batteries.)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dyson\u2019s got a team of more than 400 employees working on the project, and has for nearly three years, he said last fall. He notes that his company\u2019s expertise in solid-state battery technology and electric motors prevalent in his vacuum cleaners, bladeless fans and air purifiers is excellent preparation for producing an EV with an as-yet-viable battery.<\/p>\n

\u201cBattery technology is very important to Dyson, electric motors are very important to Dyson, environmental control is very important to us,\u201d Dyson told Reuters. \u201cI have been developing these technologies consistently because I could see that one day we could do a car.\u201d<\/p>\n

The company is looking for a home, he noted, adding it will likely be near wherever the suppliers for the new machine will be. He also said that the exterior design would be different than other EVs on the road, although it will not be a sports car.<\/p>\n

Additionally, if you\u2019re looking for a bargain vehicle, you\u2019ll be disappointed as he said it will \u201cnot be a very cheap car.\u201d He didn\u2019t eliminate any potential markets for the vehicle, but he did note that \u201cwe see a very large market for this car in the Far East.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, Dyson does have one clear idea about his venture: he\u2019s not working with a large automaker. The 71-year-old executive had a bad experience with automakers when he approached them about an idea he had for vehicle exhaust using the same cyclonic technology used in his vacuum cleaners nearly 30 years ago.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are not a johnny-come-lately onto the scene of electric cars,\u201d he told Reuters. \u201cIt has been my ambition since 1998 when I was rejected by the industry, which has happily gone on making polluting diesel engines, and governments have gone on allowing it.\u201d<\/p>\n

(To see how mass EV charging could cause problems,\u00a0<\/em>Click Here<\/a><\/span>.)<\/em><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dyson revealed the project only because it was getting increasingly more difficult to recruit new employees for the project without revealing the nature of the project. He told the 1,000-plus employees in his company via email that the project was a go, and his message also reflected his inherent distrust of the industry.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Vacuum cleaner mogul Sir James Dyson plans to follow a path similar to that of another quirky entrepreneur who decided to make electric vehicles by debuting with a single, higher-priced vehicle then following up with two more mainstream vehicles. Sound familiar? Find out more at TheDetroitBureau.com.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4389,"featured_media":119518,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7,8,5,12,9],"tags":[],"make":[110],"post-state":[],"category_old":[150,151,123,319,155,299,169,125,139,291,207],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123460"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4389"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123460\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123460"},{"taxonomy":"make","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/make?post=123460"},{"taxonomy":"post-state","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-state?post=123460"},{"taxonomy":"category_old","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedetroitbureau.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/category_old?post=123460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}