• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • VinFast Focuses on Europe to Beat Chinese Rivals to Market
  • Honda Establishes Global Motorsports Organization
  • Bugatti Rimac Signs U.S. Distribution Pact with VW
  • Tentative Settlement Ends Ford Strike Threat in Canada
  • NHTSA Revives Ford Focus Recall Investigation
  • Unifor, Ford Agree to Contract Extension
  • Volkswagen Reveals Third-Generation Tiguan
  • Minivans Aren’t as Safe as You Think, Study Claims
  • Everyone Wants to Talk to Elon
  • EV Growth to Accelerate as Price Parity Approaches
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
      • Feeder
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: 2024 Mercedes-AMG EQE SUV
    • A Week With: The 2024 BMW i7 xDrive60
    • A Week With: 2024 Alfa Romeo Tonale Veloce AWD
    • A Week With: 2023 Toyota Camry XSE Hybrid
    • A Week With: 2024 Subaru Impreza RS
    • A Week With: 2023 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 Desert Boss
    • First Drive: 2024 Polestar 2
    • A Week With: 2024 Mercedes-Benz GLE 450 4Matic
    • A Week With: 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo
    • A Week With: 2023 Toyota Prius Prime
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > History > The Rearview Mirror: Ford’s Other Pony Car — the Pinto

        The Rearview Mirror: Ford’s Other Pony Car — the Pinto

        A cynical accounting analysis and rushed development doomed Ford’s subcompact.

        Larry Printz
        Larry Printz , Assistant Managing Editor
        Sept. 17, 2022

        Ford certainly likes its steeds. The Ford Mustang not only created a new class of car, it remains with us to this day. And the Ford Bronco has returned, achieving an iconic status few would have predicted in the early 1990s when production ended. But there’s a third pony in this stable, and its one the automaker would rather forget: the Ford Pinto.

        1971 Ford Pinto 3
        Interiors were basic, decorated in vinyl and plastic.

        Introduced this week in 1970, the Pinto was created out of a desire to counteract the growing number of European and Japanese subcompacts in the American market. Ford would go on to sell more than 3.3 million Pintos, but not without a great deal of controversy. It was, perhaps, the most notorious of the badly developed 1970s cars that led to Detroit’s downfall among consumers. 

        A car is born

        Ford Vice President Lee Iacocca was a keen marketer, and inherently knew what consumers wanted. But by 1967, Volkswagen, Toyota and Datsun were responding to a signal as to what buyers wanted: small, economical cars. It’s not that Detroit hadn’t figured this out before. In 1960, the Big Three released their first compact American cars. But as expected, these small cars grew each year, to the point where they were nearly as large as midsize cars. 

        Foreign automakers provided the solution, importing cars originally designed to fit in the narrow medieval streets of European countries. But Iacocca was concerned that foreign automakers would soon seize the entire U.S. subcompact car market. He decided to meet the threat head-on.

        Ford Motor Co. executives Lee Iacocca and Don Frey with the 1964-1/2 Ford Mustang.

        But Iacocca faced other executives who didn’t agree, most importantly Ford’s new president, Semon “Bunkie” Knudsen, recently brought into Ford after spending his career at General Motors. Knudsen didn’t see the need for a domestically built subcompact car. Ford was about to introduce the Maverick, its replacement for the Falcon. 

        But Iacocca persisted, insisting a car smaller than the Maverick was needed. His case was bolstered by reports that other U.S. automakers were planning to introduce subcompacts. Henry Ford II gave Iacocca the go-ahead in January 1969.

        Development begins

        With approval given, a group numbering nearly three dozen examined small cars the being sold. The Volkswagen Beetle was seen as the main target, as it was the most popular small car of the time. But others were examined as well, including the Fiat 850 and 124, Opel Kadett, Toyota Corolla, Vauxhall Viva and the British Ford Escort. The team found Opel handled best, while delivering the best ride. The Toyota was quietest, while the Fiats were the most comfortable. 

        Engineers and designers were given parameters: the new car should weigh no more than 2,000 pounds and cost no more than $2,000. 

        1971-Ford-Pinto605888_
        The 1971 Ford Pinto. Photo Credit: RM Sothebys

        As design began, Dearborn looked to Europe for engines, quickly deciding to use the Kent overhead-cam 4-cylinder that debuted as a 1.0-liter unit in the 1960 Ford Anglia. By 1967, it had grown to 1.6 liters and was being used in the Cortina GT. Brought stateside, it generated 75 horsepower and 96 pound-feet of torque. Ford also offered the 2.0-liter Cologne Four as an option. Built by Ford of Germany, it produced 100 hp and 120 lb-ft of torque and would be offered as an option. A 4-speed manual transmission was standard; a 3-speed automatic was available with larger engine. 

        A new pony is born

        Measuring 163 inches long with a 94.2-inch wheelbase, the Pinto was diminutive in an era where cars were commonly at least more than three-and-a-half feet longer. The car’s Lilliputian size was no accident. Its rear had been shortened to save weight and money. Given its retail price, Ford needed to save money wherever possible. Even the tires were cheap: 13-inch bias-ply. The interior was basic, with lots of plastic and vinyl-covered seats. 

        1978 Ford Pinto
        By 1978, Ford had fixed the Pinto’s faulty fuel tanks.

        All in all, it was developed in a quick 25 months, not the 43 months new car development typically took at the time. Since it would take 18 months to get tooling, design, engineering and quality assurance didn’t have enough time. 

        The 1971 Ford Pinto came to market in the fall of 1970, just as the Chevrolet Vega and AMC Gremlin arrived. Chrysler offered the Dodge Colt, built by Mitsubishi, and the Plymouth Cricket, manufactured by Hillman of England. But Ford’s new foal proved popular, selling 352,402 units in its first year of production. Only the Falcon and Mustang sold more in their debutante year.

        A horse of a different color

        But the shortcuts taken and cash saved to make the car profitable would soon take their toll.

        In May 1972, Lilian Gray, a California housewife, burned to death when her Pinto was rear-ended by another car and caught fire. Her passenger survived, but with disfiguring burns. 

        The defect that sparked the fire was known to Ford. Their own rear crash test tests saw it catch fire in all 40 tests conducted at speeds above 25 mph. Even before it reached market, company crash tests saw the Pinto catch fire in 8 out of 11 tests.

        1980 Ford Pinto
        The Ford Pinto would exit production after the 1980 model year.

        It was due to the gas tanks placement behind the rear axle but ahead of the rear bumper. When struck, the fuel filler neck would rupture, sparking a fire. While this placement was no different from many small cars of the time, during development, the Pinto’s back end had been shortened to save money. Once the defect was identified, Ford built the car anyway, as the assembly-line machinery was already tooled. 

        Most appallingly, Ford had conducted a cost-benefit analysis, weighing the costs associated with lives lost to the faulty design and the ensuing legal costs, versus the cost to rectify the defect. They concluded that it would cost an additional $11 per vehicle, or $113 million. But damage payouts would only be $49 million in legal payouts, so the defect was left in place.

        While the company did fix the problem in a 1977 design update, the company ended up paying millions in damages, recalled 1.5 million cars, being charged with reckless homicide and caused untold damage to its reputation. Ultimately, foreign carmakers, the ones the Pinto was meant to defeat, won market share.

        Pinto production ended in 1980.

        The following year, Ford debuted its newest advertising tagline: Quality Is Job One.

        How to Care for Your Car

        Cheap Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice

        Best Extended Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice
        Recently Published

        VinFast Focuses on Europe to Beat Chinese Rivals to Market

        Today

        Honda Establishes Global Motorsports Organization

        Today

        Bugatti Rimac Signs U.S. Distribution Pact with VW

        Yesterday

        One response to “The Rearview Mirror: Ford’s Other Pony Car — the Pinto”

        1. Graeme Roberts says:
          September 21, 2022 at 11:32 am

          Kent engine, (made initially as a 1.0 and 1.2), updated to a cross-flow head for 1968 European Fords (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.6), was overhead valve, not OHC. The new-for-1971 OHC engine found its way into Mk3 Cortinas and numerous other European and English Fords and has long been referred to colloquially as the ‘Pinto’ engine. UK capacity was 1.6 and two-litre.

          Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2023
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: