• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • Ford Recalling 39K Full-Size SUVs Due to Potential Fire Issue
  • Mercedes-Benz Abandons Its Entry-Level Ambitions
  • Push is on to Make Stealing a Catalytic Converter a Federal Crime
  • Toyota Marks 25th Anniversary of Sienna Minivan
  • Honda Offers Early Look at Prologue EV
  • Argo AI Shifts to Driverless Operations in Two Markets
  • Hyundai, Kia, Honda, Jeep and Nissan Fare Badly in Latest Crash Tests
  • Finally! Lexus RX to Get a Complete Makeover
  • Inflation Affecting Summer Vacation Plans
  • 2023 BMW 3 Series Gets Updated Exterior, More Tech, Mild Hybrid Drivetrain
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: 2022 Kia Forte GT
    • First Drive: 2023 Genesis GV60
    • First Drive: 2022 Mercedes-Benz C 300
    • First Impression: 2023 Nissan Z
    • A Week With: 2022 Lexus LC 500 Convertible
    • A Week With: 2022 Ram 2500 Power Wagon Crew Cab
    • First Drive: 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning
    • First Drive(s): 2022 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate and AT4X
    • A Week With: 2022 BMW i4 M50
    • A Week With: 2022 Mazda CX-5
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automakers > Product Liability Lawsuit Puts GM in Spotlight — Again

        Product Liability Lawsuit Puts GM in Spotlight — Again

        Case on hold pending judge's decision on forcing Barra to testify.

        Joseph Szczesny
        Joseph Szczesny , Executive Editor
        March 18, 2021
        GM Trailblazer sensor lawsuit vehicle
        GM is in the spotlight again about its safety practices due to a product liability lawsuit involving a 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer. (Photo credit: The Cooper Firm)

        General Motors has found itself entangled in a product liability lawsuit that raises new questions about the reforms the company said it instituted after the ignition-switch scandal that contributed to the deaths of 124 motorists and cost GM millions.

        The suit, Buchanan vs General Motors, is on hold pending a decision by a Georgia Appellate Court on whether GM CEO Mary Barra must give a deposition in the case, which dates to 2016 and involves the 2014 death of 42-year-old woman on a hilly road.

        The fight about whether the Barra ought to testify under oath has drawn the interest of outside groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Tort Reform Association. The chamber argues that busy CEOs should not be forced to testify on matters of which they have no direct knowledge. ATRA argues in its amicus brief that CEOs should not be given special privileges.

        GM argues that Barra, who won plaudits for her adroit handling in 2014 of the ignition-switch controversies that prompted the dismissal of more than a dozen GM engineers for failing to catch the problem, should not be forced to testify.

        Details of the lawsuit

        GM Trailblazer lawsuit vehicle two
        A Georgia judge is considering a request that would force GM CEO Mary Barra to testify during the trial.

        The lawsuit at the heart of the dispute revolves around what the plaintiff’s lawyer, Lance Cooper of Marietta, Georgia, describes as a faulty sensor that turned off the stability control in the 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer in which the dead woman was driving.

        In court filings, GM’s defense has been that Glenda Marie Buchanan, the woman who died, was a distracted driver, who had been on her phone while driving on a difficult stretch of road north of Atlanta.

        However, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Buchanan’s husband, claims GM knew or should have known about the defective sensor in the Chevrolet Trailblazer.

        According to Reuters, which conducted an extensive reviewed the records in the case, including many still under a protective seal, an internal review at GM in 2018 found that more than 73,000 warranty claims or more than 10% of the total build for that type of vehicle — an unusually high rate in an industry where a failure rate of more than 1% draws scrutiny.

        Handling warranty claims data

        Carmakers receive hundreds of warranty claims from dealers each week and employ systems for analyzing that data. The systems are growing increasingly sophisticated and can pinpoint specific problems on the factory floor.

        GM Trailblazer lawsuit vehicle three
        GM’s lawyers contend Buchanan was engaged in distracted driving behavior and that caused her to lose control of her vehicle, not a faulty sensor.

        However, the large number of complaints about the steering angle sensor, which came from a GM supplier that is now part of the ZF Group, most likely TRW, did raise concerns, according to Reuters, but GM was unable to determine whether the sensor was defective at the time of the crash. The company has not issued any kind of recall.

        Contrary to the arguments made by the Chamber of Commerce, the context and scope of the problem and the review suggest concern among GM’s more senior executives. However, GM officials also say privately the auto company has no indication, except for the solitary case in Georgia, of any accidents attributable to the sensor.

        Reuters also said the National Highway Traffic Administration considered opening an investigation into the issue but after a review declined order further query or recall.

        Barra insists that GM’s old culture has been systematically rooted out as the company brings in new employees and new executives to focus on electric and autonomous vehicles.

        In addition, GM’s internal procedures for reviewing issues that could jeopardize customers or the public have been completely overhauled since 2014.

        GM Trailblazer lawsuit vehicle four
        During its internal investigation, GM was unable to determine if the sensor was working.

        “GM is committed to safety in everything we do. GM has comprehensively rebuilt and strengthened its product safety processes. Those processes were fully employed to investigate this case involving a vehicle built more than a decade ago,” noted a GM spokesman in an email.

        Georgia favorable for lawsuits

        Georgia attorney Cooper has tangled with GM previously. He handled a key lawsuit in the ignition-switch controversy that involved the death in 2010 of a young woman driving a defective Chevrolet Cobalt. In fact, Cooper wrote a book about the case, “Cobalt Coverup.”

        Georgia has been a favorable jurisdiction for attacking automakers.

        In 2015, a jury in Decatur, Georgia awarded $150 million to a plaintiff in a case involving a Jeep Cherokee with a gasoline tank that exploded killing a young man. Attorneys for the plaintiff argued Chrysler should have known the gas tank was vulnerable. The suit also called for Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne to testify in open court.

        The verdict came two years after FCA settled had agreed to a “scaled-down” recall of Jeeps with rear-mounted gas tanks.

        In it is brief in the GM case, however, the Chamber of Commerce noted that the state Georgia has a reputation for having a legal system that is tilted against corporations.

        Recently Published
        2021 Ford Expedition STX front

        Ford Recalling 39K Full-Size SUVs Due to Potential Fire Issue

        Yesterday
        Mercedes Drive Pilot steering wheel controls

        Mercedes-Benz Abandons Its Entry-Level Ambitions

        Yesterday
        Catalytic converter theft

        Push is on to Make Stealing a Catalytic Converter a Federal Crime

        Yesterday

        One response to “Product Liability Lawsuit Puts GM in Spotlight — Again”

        1. W S Tyson says:
          June 16, 2021 at 11:05 am

          Limited key usage. Alarm activated using key to open door. Makeshift adjust ment is limiting not dependable. Suggested repair not a predictable alternative.

          Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2022
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: