• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • First Look: 2024 Toyota Grand Highlander
  • Tesla Takes Top Two Sales Spots in California for 2022
  • New Vehicle Buyers Face Squeeze as Interest Rates Climb
  • The Inside Story of the 2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse
  • Honda’s Big Bet on Fuel-Cell Tech Doesn’t Stop with Passenger Cars
  • First Look: 2024 BMW X5 and X6
  • Nissan, Renault and Mitsubishi Expand Global Partnership
  • Better the Second Time: Mercedes-Benz eSprinter
  • VinFast Raises Launch Concerns by Cutting 80 U.S. Jobs
  • Faraday Future Secures Cash, Prepares to Build Cars
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
      • Feeder
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: 2023 Kia Sportage Hybrid
    • First Drive: 2023 Honda Accord
    • A Week With: 2023 Lexus GX 460 Black Line
    • A Week With: 2023 BMW X1 xDrive28i
    • A Week With: 2023 Kia Niro EV
    • A Week With: 2023 Hyundai Palisade Calligraphy
    • A Week With: 2023 Ford F-150 Raptor R 4x4 Super Crew
    • A Week With: 2023 Genesis Electrified G80 AWD
    • A Week With: 2023 Land Rover Defender 110 V-8
    • First Drive: 2023 Honda Pilot TrailSport
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automobiles > GM – LG Chem Find New Way to Work Together to Bring Chevy Bolt to Market

        GM – LG Chem Find New Way to Work Together to Bring Chevy Bolt to Market

        Traditional OE-supplier approach "unsuitable and unsustainable."

        Paul A. Eisenstein
        Paul A. Eisenstein , Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
        Oct. 20, 2015
        Lower battery costs will let GM price the Chevy Bolt around $35,000 before federal incentives.

        Often criticized for the way it hammers price cuts out of its suppliers, General Motors is taking a very different approach in the development of its first long-range battery-electric vehicle, the Chevrolet Bolt. In a joint news conference with Korea’s LG Corp., GM officials outlined a new strategy putting a premium on partnership.

        The new approach could be a blueprint for the future, suggested Mark Reuss, GM’s global product development director. It may also help LG become a major force in the emerging electric vehicle market, rather than just being relegated to supplying batteries to carmakers like GM.

        In-Site!

        “GM used to act more like a dictator than a customer,” said Reuss, during a tour of the electric vehicle operations at the maker’s suburban Detroit technical center.  That approach, primarily focused on squeezing out costs, is “unsuitable and unsustainable,” Reuss added.

        That became all the more apparent, he and other officials noted, as GM set out to put development of the Bolt on the fast-track. Unveiled in concept form at the January 2015 Detroit Auto Show and approved for production a few months later, the goal is to have the battery-car in showrooms next year – lightning speed in automotive terms.

        (Click Here for a review of the gen-2, 2016 Chevrolet Volt plug-in.)

        LG Chem already supplies the lithium batteries for the Chevrolet Volt and Chevy Spark EV.

        GM and LG have a relationship dating back almost a decade. The Korean firm won a shoot-out among battery suppliers for the Chevy Volt contract. Not to be confused with Bolt, that model became the industry’s first mass-market plug-in hybrid when it went on sale late in 2009. LG Chem, the Korean company’s battery arm, also won the contract for the Chevy Spark, a pure battery-electric vehicle, or BEV.

        It was the go-to supplier when work began on the Chevrolet Bolt. But GM realized that while price matters, it needed to do more than just save a few dollars on the EV’s batteries. It also had to address two other critical challenges: range and utility.

        “We solved those” by working collaboratively, claimed Reuss, LG taking the lead on much of the Bolt’s powertrain.

        “This car will become desirable because people will want (it), not because it is an EV,” said Reuss.

        (Vacuum maker Dyson buys promising Mich battery start-up – but GM also owns a stake. Click Here for more.)

        The various LG units, including its powerful LG Electronics arm, will have a dozen different major components on the Bolt. That includes the batteries and several key parts of the powertrain, including its onboard charger. But LG Electronics also will provide display and infotainment systems for the new car.

        For LG, as a whole, the Chevy Bolt project could be a harbinger of a new, higher-profile role in the battery-car market. “Our vision is to become an electric powertrain supplier to the auto industry” beyond just GM, said Ken Chang, Vice President – LG Electronics, Vehicle Components Division.

        The company is investing $250 million in an engineering and manufacturing facility in Incheon, just outside Seoul, to develop and manufacture Bolt components. But that new facility could readily serve other GM projects – and other manufacturers.

        As for GM, “We feel good about what the relationship with LG has taught us about our relations with other suppliers,” said Reuss.

        Those other suppliers are likely going to want proof. GM has traditionally scored low in studies of the working relationship between automakers and parts manufacturers.

        Consumers will also be waiting to see the results.

        For their part, neither Reuss nor Bolt chief engineer Pam Fletcher would predict the volumes they expect once the battery-car goes on sale. GM officials don’t want to repeat the mistakes made when they offered overly optimistic forecasts for the Chevy Volt – especially at a time when low fuel prices have hurt sales of alternative-power vehicles.

        But GM is hoping to “crack the code” with the new car, said Reuss, by offering at least 200 miles per range and a price tag of around $35,000 – which will drop below $30,000 once federal and state incentives get factored in.

        (Click Here to check out the five finalists for Green Car of the Year.)

        How to Care for Your Car

        Cheap Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice

        Best Extended Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice
        Recently Published
        Toyota Grand Highlander Chicago debut with Matazzaro

        First Look: 2024 Toyota Grand Highlander

        Yesterday
        2021 Tesla Model Y blue

        Tesla Takes Top Two Sales Spots in California for 2022

        Yesterday
        February car sales

        New Vehicle Buyers Face Squeeze as Interest Rates Climb

        Yesterday

        One response to “GM – LG Chem Find New Way to Work Together to Bring Chevy Bolt to Market”

        1. GT101 says:
          October 20, 2015 at 8:46 pm

          I’d bet there are hundreds of GM suppliers that will believe that GM has changed when they see it in their contracts and no sooner. Ford isn’t much better when they make vendors wait 300 days to get paid or they lose the contract. Then there are the yearly decreases in price that vendors must charge for each year of a contract. It’s no wonder that product quality has taken a big hit along with customer satisfaction.

          Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2023
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: