• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • The Rearview Mirror: Ford Courts Ferrari
  • Hyundai Building New $5.5 Billion EV, Battery Manufacturing Complex Near Savannah
  • Tesla Chief Elon Musk and The Very Bad Week
  • Polestar 3 Set for October Debut
  • Faster, Lighter BMW M4 CSL Makes its Debut
  • Fabled Mercedes Sports Car Sells for Record $146M
  • Ford Recalling 39K Full-Size SUVs Due to Potential Fire Issue
  • Mercedes-Benz Abandons Its Entry-Level Ambitions
  • Push is on to Make Stealing a Catalytic Converter a Federal Crime
  • Toyota Marks 25th Anniversary of Sienna Minivan
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: 2022 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL R-Line 4Motion
    • A Week With: 2022 Kia Forte GT
    • First Drive: 2023 Genesis GV60
    • First Drive: 2022 Mercedes-Benz C 300
    • First Impression: 2023 Nissan Z
    • A Week With: 2022 Lexus LC 500 Convertible
    • A Week With: 2022 Ram 2500 Power Wagon Crew Cab
    • First Drive: 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning
    • First Drive(s): 2022 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate and AT4X
    • A Week With: 2022 BMW i4 M50
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automobiles > Automakers Enhance Their APEAL, with Koreans Setting the Pace

        Automakers Enhance Their APEAL, with Koreans Setting the Pace

        Safety tech wins thumbs up, but balky infotainment systems generate grumbles.

        Paul A. Eisenstein
        Paul A. Eisenstein , Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
        July 22, 2015
        Mini showed the biggest improvement overall, thanks to the new Cooper hardtop.

        When it comes to adding new high-tech hardware to their vehicles, automakers are generating a mix of both praise and complaints, according to a new study by J.D. Power and Associates.

        On the whole, new vehicle buyers have rated their 2015 models higher than ever, and Power’s 20th annual APEAL study gives a chunk of the credit to the latest safety technologies, such as blind-spot monitoring and forward collision warning systems. At the same time, motorists registered a number of complaints about faulty infotainment hardware and balky voice recognition systems.

        At the Cutting Edge!

        With rare exception, automakers saw their APEAL scores improve this year, the overall average rising to 798 points out of a possible 1,000. But the Korean makers collectively posted the biggest improvements, while the Japanese lagged behind the industry on the whole.

        That echoes the findings of the J.D. Power Initial Quality Study released a month ago. It found the Korean carmakers posting the biggest overall improvement, with Kia ranked second and Hyundai fourth among 33 brands in terms of the lack of “problems” during the first 90 days of ownership.

        The Uconnect system, shown here in a Fiat 500, was rare among infotainment systems getting good reviews from owners.

        (Japanese makers slide, Koreans surge in latest JD Power IQS. Click Here for more.)

        The IQS is a classic “Things-Gone-Wrong” study. Power researchers put more of a focus on “Things-Gone-Right” with the APEAL survey, short for Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout. It asks owners to evaluate their vehicles across 77 different attributes, ranging from design to performance, fuel economy to advanced technology.

        Overall, Porsche ranked at the top of the list – as it did in the 2015 IQS, followed by Jaguar, BMW, Mercedes and Audi. Among non-premium brands, Mini came in tops.

        Click on the image for a closer look at how individual brands fared in the 2015 APEAL study.

        Not surprisingly, luxury makers traditionally outscore their mainstream rivals, reflecting their added features, among other things. But the gap between luxury and non-luxury marques narrowed significantly, according to Power Vice President Renee Stephens, to the lowest point in a decade. The average premium score was 841 out of a possible 1,000, while it rose to 790 among non-premium brands.

        Korean automakers gained an average seven points in the 2015 APEAL study, while Europeans and Detroit brands were each up six points. The Japanese, with just a two-point improvement, lagged well behind. Japanese makers, on the whole, also slipped in the Initial Quality Study.

        (Korean brands score big again in vehicle satisfaction awards. For more, Click Here.)

        Korean brands, as a group, scored the biggest gains in the 2016 JD Power APEAL study.

        Among individual brands, Volvo scored the biggest improvement among premium brands while Mini had the biggest gain in the non-premium category – and among automakers overall, rising 30 points this year. That was largely due to the positive reception it received for the newly redesigned Mini Cooper model.

        Click on the image for a list of the most APEAL-ing cars.

        As for the 26 individual vehicle segments, Mercedes-Benz not only lead in the Large Premium Car category but had the single-highest rating of any vehicle. Chevrolet, Ford and Porsche each led in three categories, Audi, BMW, Dodge, Mazda and Mini in two segments.

        While all-new or completely redesigned vehicles often slip in the Power IQS study because of start-up production problems, these new models generally led the industry in Power’s APEAL, in part due to the rapid pace in which manufacturers are adding new features, improving performance and boosting fuel economy, according to Power officials.

        Owners rated their 2015 vehicles higher in virtually every category this time, and one reason was the increasing proliferation of high-tech safety systems, noted Stephens. “Those who had blind spot warning tended to rate their vehicles more highly,” she explained, adding that this technology was found on 36% of the vehicles the study covered.

        Click on the image for a list of the most APEAL-ing trucks, SUVs, CUVs.

        But while advanced safety technology scored well, owners registered disappointment in their infotainment systems. They pointed to voice recognition systems that were balky, malfunctioning navigation technology and touch screens that didn’t work right, as well as the confusion they faced in operating those systems.

        A rare exception was Fiat Chrysler whose Uconnect system received generally favorable reviews, according to Stephens.

        (Fiat Chrysler takes the brass ring in the latest Total Quality Index. Click Here to find out why.)

        There is an ongoing debate over how to measure quality, especially as even the worst brands have made major improvements in recent years. In the Power IQS, for example, as many as half of the owners surveyed experienced no “problems” during their first 90 days of ownership. That has led to more of a focus on things-gone-right surveys, like APEAL.

        And, indeed, Stephens noted, “This study has one of the highest correlations to an owner’s likelihood to recommend a vehicle,” as well as the likelihood that an owner will return to that same model or brand the next time they trade in.

        Recently Published

        The Rearview Mirror: Ford Courts Ferrari

        Yesterday
        Hyundai Savannah logo

        Hyundai Building New $5.5 Billion EV, Battery Manufacturing Complex Near Savannah

        May 20, 2022
        Musk speaks at Plaid debut

        Tesla Chief Elon Musk and The Very Bad Week

        May 20, 2022

        One response to “Automakers Enhance Their APEAL, with Koreans Setting the Pace”

        1. Jorge says:
          July 22, 2015 at 2:10 pm

          A recent survey showed that woman are more swayed by so called safety devices in newer cars, then men. Evidently woman assume that these devices all function properly and will protect them in the event of an accident. There is no doubt that some safety features do work well but some are more gimmick than savior IMO. Eliminating ALL driver distractions is likely to be far better at reducing accidents than passive safety devices intended to reduce injury.

          Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2022
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: