GM dismissed 15 employees and disciplined five others in the fallout from the controversy over the fallout from the faulty ignition switch used in small cars that have engulfed the company.
GM Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra said that the employees are no longer with the company and included employees from several different departments.
“For the most part they were on the senior level,” Barra said.
The fundamental problem was that the employees allowed a part that didn’t meet specifications to go into production and secondly didn’t understand how the faulty part could have interacted with other critical systems such as the airbags.
“They were deemed incompetent or they didn’t understand their role in the company,” said Barra, who also insisted there was no conspiracy among employees to cover up the ramifications of the faulty part.
At least some of the employees involved in the house cleaning came from GM’s legal department, but she said the company’s top lawyer is still with the company.
“Overall the report found that, from start to finish, the Cobalt saga was riddled with failures which led to tragic results for many,” Barra said, adding there was no evidence that any employee made a trade-off between safety and cost.
(GM misdiagnosed switch problem, report said. For more, Click Here.)
Mark Reuss, GM vice president for product development, said in many cases the terminated employees did not look at the impact on the entire vehicle. GM now has a system in place that will prevent the problem from recurring again, he said.
(Click Here for details on Mini’s new four-door.)
“We have strengthened the product development process,” Barra said. “In the case of the Cobalt, it was clearly a safety problem,” added Barra, who declined to say how many employees were actually dismissed or forced to retire since many of them had accumulated years of service with GM.
(To see more about GM’s report, Click Here.)
“There has been dramatic change at General Motors,” Barra said. “There is a commitment to do great vehicles. A culture doesn’t change overnight. It’s a journey,” she said, adding afety and quality are critical.
“We will be a better company,” she said. “Our employees are disappointed. They want to build great cars, trucks and crossovers.”
Dear Ms Barra,you are a fresh face whom I believe is the change GM needs.As a 35 year retiree I watched in disappointment as GM mismanagement tore our company apart.Keep up the good work and please don’ disappoint me.Good luck
After buying my 2003 Dura max pickup I no longer buy GM. To many issues. You bought junk parts and the wiring New Deli was bad. I used to love your cars. You forced me to go to Toyota. Anthony J Robirts
GM may be the worst business model with the worst culture of any company in America. Want to get black-balled? Just mention a good idea to anyone over your immediate supervisor’s head. you will get shut down, shut out and told to shut up. Politics there are poison. Thanks though for costing taxpayers over 1.5bil in government debt forgiven once the smoke cleared from having their final stock sale. What a joke.
I have purchased GM products for most of my life. At this time I own 2 of the Buick E-Assist cars and enjoy both.
The Cadillac’s 1996 and 2002 CTS that I owned before this time were a total disappointment. Both were extreme Oil burners with absolutely no assistance from either the dealers or GM. I sure hope the same thing does not happen to the Buick Lacrose cars