• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • Bugatti Rimac Signs U.S. Distribution Pact with VW
  • Tentative Settlement Ends Ford Strike Threat in Canada
  • NHTSA Revives Ford Focus Recall Investigation
  • Unifor, Ford Agree to Contract Extension
  • Volkswagen Reveals Third-Generation Tiguan
  • Minivans Aren’t as Safe as You Think, Study Claims
  • Everyone Wants to Talk to Elon
  • EV Growth to Accelerate as Price Parity Approaches
  • The Rearview Mirror: Not General Motors' Cup of Tea
  • Subaru Considering Indiana Plant for EVs
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
      • Feeder
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: The 2024 BMW i7 xDrive60
    • A Week With: 2024 Alfa Romeo Tonale Veloce AWD
    • A Week With: 2023 Toyota Camry XSE Hybrid
    • A Week With: 2024 Subaru Impreza RS
    • A Week With: 2023 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 Desert Boss
    • First Drive: 2024 Polestar 2
    • A Week With: 2024 Mercedes-Benz GLE 450 4Matic
    • A Week With: 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo
    • A Week With: 2023 Toyota Prius Prime
    • A Week With: The 2023 BMW 330e xDrive
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automobiles > The Consumer Reports List To Avoid: Worst Vehicles

        The Consumer Reports List To Avoid: Worst Vehicles

        Magazine chronicles problem vehicles in all categories.

        Michael Strong
        Michael Strong , Managing Editor
        Feb. 26, 2014
        Taurus adds Torque Vectoring Control, which uses smart brake control to help the car smoothly accelerate through curves, which helps build confidence for drivers.
        Consumer Reports cited the Ford Taurus as car to avoid due to reliability issues and a lack of interior space.

        Annually, potential car buyers, industry observers and executives await Consumer Reports’ top picks for the year. What the list shows is there are plenty of great cars and trucks to choose from; however, the magazine doesn’t stop there.

        While it doesn’t take long for everyone to figure out the mag thinks that Tesla’s Model S is the best car – maybe ever – and that the Dodge Ram is pushing to make the full-size pickup race a three-truck competition, there is a side of the industry that tends to get pushed by the wayside.

        Keeping You Safe!

        The pub also creates a list of vehicles to avoid. Some on the list are not a shock, such as the Mitsubishi Lancer, but others are a bit of a surprise, including the Land Rover Evoque.

        The maker taking the biggest hit is Chrysler and Jeep. In fact, Jeep nearly swept the small SUV category with the best thing said about its product was “competent.”

        (Honda set to kill off Insight Hybrid. For more, Click Here.)

        Here are the vehicles to avoid, according to Consumer Reports:

        Subcompact cars

        • Smart ForTwo
        • Scion iQ
        • Chevrolet Spark

        Compact cars

        • Scion tC
        • Mitsubishi Lancer
        • Dodge Dart
        The Range Rover Evoque was criticized by Consumer Reports for its handling as well as a noisy cabin.

        Midsize sedans

        • Chrysler 200/Dodge Avenger

        Large sedans

        • Ford Taurus

        Luxury sedans

        • Lexus IS
        • Lincoln MKS
        • BMW 7-Series

        Wagons & minivans

        • Honda Crosstour

        Small SUVs

        • Jeep Compass
        • Jeep Patriot
        • Jeep Cherokee with 2.4-liter engine
        • Mitsubishi Outlander

        Midsize & large SUVs

        • Ford Edge
        • Nissan Armada
        • Dodge Journey

        Luxury SUVs

        • Volvo XC90
        • Lincoln MKX
        • Range Rover Evoque

        Ford’s products were widely panned for the seemingly never-ending issues related to MyFordTouch, or its Lincoln brethren, MyLincolnTouch, although the Taurus made the list for being “ridiculously cramped for such a large car.”

        (Click Here to see GM’s expansion of the ignition switch recall.)

        Another surprise vehicle on the list is the BMW 7-Series, which was described as “a ponderous, technology-laden vehicle with … ungainly handling.”

         

        How to Care for Your Car

        Cheap Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice

        Best Extended Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice
        Recently Published

        Bugatti Rimac Signs U.S. Distribution Pact with VW

        Yesterday
        Unifor after Ford deal 2023

        Tentative Settlement Ends Ford Strike Threat in Canada

        Yesterday

        NHTSA Revives Ford Focus Recall Investigation

        Yesterday

        19 responses to “The Consumer Reports List To Avoid: Worst Vehicles”

        1. Tom Martin says:
          February 26, 2014 at 12:21 pm

          Years ago I was in the market for a vacuum cleaner and, knowing nothing about them, consulted Consumer Reports. This taught me a lesson: Never listen to any of their reviews. The vacuum highest on their list turned out to be junk.

          As far as the Taurus goes, I have a 2013 Taurus and have not had any problems with it. Reliable, comfortable, solid, spacious.

          CR=BS

          Reply
        2. Jorge M. says:
          February 27, 2014 at 8:45 am

          CR sometimes gets it right but often misses the mark, IME. A lot depends on their criteria to determine desirable or reliable products. As a result I wouldn’t use CR for much more than a second opinion.

          Reply
        3. Joe says:
          February 27, 2014 at 9:02 am

          I leased a 2011 Lincoln MKX and now have a 2013 Lincoln MKX. I went to the newer car for the great safety features, side radar and collision warning system. The car can really move when you step on the gas. No repair issues with either car. My local Lincoln dealer is great and treats my like a luxury car owner! I tell people all the time this Lincoln is NOT your grandfathers Lincoln, it’s a driving machine. To keep this in perspective I have also owned an BMW 530i and an X5. Not sure what makes the MKX go on this list.

          Reply
          1. Winnie Jenkems says:
            February 27, 2014 at 10:44 pm

            It looks like a WHALE

            Reply
        4. Doug Bennett says:
          February 27, 2014 at 11:15 am

          I don’t believe most of their reports….biased with sideline “funny business” going on.

          Reply
        5. Joe says:
          February 27, 2014 at 11:38 am

          I’ve rented a number of the newest Taurus’. I have found them to be a fine automobile. Likewise, during the period when Consumer Reports was slamming Mercedes products, I purchased 3 new Mercedes over a 5 year period that were stellar vehicles. Being a car guy, I take CR auto evals with a grain of salt. Only their safety ratings are worth consideration.

          Reply
        6. Gmon says:
          February 27, 2014 at 12:48 pm

          Anyone who has been in an industry that CR deals with knows that the publication is worthless.

          Here is the low down… No mag can make a living on their subscriptions/sales alone, and CR doesn’t have advertising, so where does the money come from? The dirty secret is that CR solicits ‘donations’ from the industries that they delve in to, donate, and you get good ratings, fail to donate? good luck.

          Reply
        7. indy says:
          February 27, 2014 at 12:54 pm

          Yeah when CR started doing technology reviews, and I couldn’t read one review without shaking my head at the complete unawareness of ignorance, I cancelled the subscription. It called into question my trust of everything they had ever written, it was so lacking in understanding.

          Reply
        8. Benny Caleb says:
          February 27, 2014 at 1:19 pm

          Martin, I suggest you go look up two words, evidence and anecdote. Your personal experience should in no way color even your belief in the process that CR uses.

          Reply
        9. Car Guy says:
          February 27, 2014 at 4:08 pm

          I was puzzled to see the new Outlander on there. I drove a new 14 and found it to be very nice. Only drawback to the lancer is the mid 2000’s interior! Other then that its one of the sportiest looking and best handling cars in its class!

          Reply
        10. Kaydon says:
          February 27, 2014 at 4:42 pm

          Avoid the Lexus IS???? It’s been a rave with all the critics and for the past several years in a row, has the best resell value and most reliable vehicle. CR I think you better think again about that. I also don’t trust CR worth a grain of salt.

          Reply
        11. Stu says:
          February 27, 2014 at 4:44 pm

          I’ve driven most of these cars as rentals and will have to agree with CR on this list (though curious why Evoque made it on here).

          Reply
        12. Tim says:
          February 28, 2014 at 2:15 am

          Why is it that CR people have such a hard time with tech? If used the MyFordTouch system in my mother’s 2012 vehicle and had no trouble figuring it out without a manual. I wished for some minor improvements, but it was very useable. In the 2014 we bought, Ford added some hard buttons to make common controls easy to initiate, such as changing the temp, adjusting volume, etc. anyone who can’t figure it out has got to be a Luddite.

          Reply
        13. Jorge M. says:
          February 28, 2014 at 8:47 am

          Unfortunately many people in the U.S. lack a basic technical education so they rely on reviews by CR as their primary product education and this is a real problem. CR has a huge influence on consumer purchases even when their reviews are blatantly incorrect in their test premise or conclusions.

          It’s very easy to lead technically iliterate consumers where ever you desire for them to go. How long does it take Honda or Toyota to fix something that CR perceives as being less than optimal even if CR’s perception is incorrect? Billions of dollars in sales are tied to a CR report.

          Reply
        14. jerry valuch says:
          February 28, 2014 at 9:26 am

          I AM A OWNER OF A 2013 LINCOLN MKS. I WOULD SAY TO ANYONE IT IS A FINE CAR NO PROBLEMS, WITH MY TOUCH,ALL SAFETY FEATURES,AND THE EASE OF ENTERING AND EXITING THE CAR. C R STATES IT LOOKS THE PART,A LUXURY SEDAN BUT LIKES NOTHING ELSE.PEOPLE ASK IF I WOULD BUY A LINCOLN AGAIN YES YES YES.ONE MORE COMMENT THE COMFORT SETING WHEN DRIVING IS MUCH BETTER THAN MOST.

          Reply
        15. Bill Barton says:
          March 1, 2014 at 7:23 am

          Many years ago CR rated a camera as there best buy. I managed a camera store at that time and people would come in and would not look at anything else. The company is no more, even before the rave review from CR there were major QC issues with the camera and their warr. repair department was very poor. Guess what happened after they really started selling like hot cakes. I really learned my lesson with CR reviews then….

          Reply
        16. rene says:
          March 1, 2014 at 10:55 am

          Im a used car dealer………..said all about cars , my line is cars average 7 years old around 120k miles……at this point mith of good cars are destroy ….my advise ..dont buy Mercedes …740 BMW 550 BMW Cadillacs Never and Audi Jaguar porsche mini cooper…….

          Reply
        17. Dan D says:
          March 1, 2014 at 10:34 pm

          In 1995, bought a new Jeep Wrangler and my friend bought a new Lexus. He warned me that CR gave my choice a very poor rating and his one of the highest. In the first 6 months of ownership, his car was in the shop more than not, and eventually exchanged (on a lease) due to all the problems. After 5 years and 120,000 miles, I didn’t have a single problem with the Wrangler. I completely agree that CR cannot be trusted; many products I’ve owned that got the highest CR ratings were complete crap.

          Reply
          1. Paul A. Eisenstein says:
            March 2, 2014 at 9:13 am

            I have to admit I have had my share of similar experiences with appliances. A top-rated refrigerator was an absolute nightmare that could never be properly repaired and a vacuum cleaner was a similar horror show.

            Paul E.

            Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2023
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: