• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • The Inside Story of the 2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse
  • Honda’s Big Bet on Fuel-Cell Tech Doesn’t Stop with Passenger Cars
  • First Look: 2024 BMW X5 and X6
  • Nissan, Renault and Mitsubishi Expand Global Partnership
  • Better the Second Time: Mercedes-Benz eSprinter
  • VinFast Raises Launch Concerns by Cutting 80 U.S. Jobs
  • Faraday Future Secures Cash, Prepares to Build Cars
  • BMW Spending $865M in Mexico for EV, Battery Plants
  • Q&A: Dave Marek, Acura Global Creative Director
  • Biden Admin. Makes EV Credits Available to More Buyers
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
      • Feeder
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • A Week With: 2023 Kia Sportage Hybrid
    • First Drive: 2023 Honda Accord
    • A Week With: 2023 Lexus GX 460 Black Line
    • A Week With: 2023 BMW X1 xDrive28i
    • A Week With: 2023 Kia Niro EV
    • A Week With: 2023 Hyundai Palisade Calligraphy
    • A Week With: 2023 Ford F-150 Raptor R 4x4 Super Crew
    • A Week With: 2023 Genesis Electrified G80 AWD
    • A Week With: 2023 Land Rover Defender 110 V-8
    • First Drive: 2023 Honda Pilot TrailSport
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automobiles > Pedal to the Metal? New Study Quantifies the Mileage You’ll Lose

        Pedal to the Metal? New Study Quantifies the Mileage You’ll Lose

        Decline is surprisingly consistent between vehicles.

        Paul A. Eisenstein
        Paul A. Eisenstein , Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
        Jan. 23, 2013
        Slow down, you move too fast? Even a 10 mph increase in vehicle speed means a sharp reduction in mileage, according to a new study.

        Studies show that fuel economy has become the number one concern among American car buyers – but motorists have also been pressing for higher speed limits which can sharply reduce the mileage a car gets.

        While that might seem common sense, a new study clearly quantifies the impact of putting the pedal to the metal. And it finds that there are surprisingly few differences between vehicles, whether brick-like SUVs or sleek, wind-cheating sports cars.

        Come Along for the Ride!

        “People really like rules of thumb and if you’re increasing your speed from 50 to 60 miles an hour, we find for the largest number of vehicles fuel economy will go down about 12%,” said Brian H. West, a researcher at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, in Knoxville, Tennessee, where the study was conducted.

        Pushing a little faster, you’ll see mileage drop about 14% going from 60 to 70 mph, while fuel economy will dip yet another 16% if you nudge the speedometer up to 80.

        While West says he “wasn’t surprised” by the general results of the new study, he and the rest of the research team did make an unexpected discovery.  They had expected to see some types of vehicles do better than others, but the reduction in fuel economy was consistent across all vehicle classes, even the heaviest and boxiest SUVs, with only a one or two percent variations from the least to most efficient models.

        That included hybrid vehicles which are really designed for stop-and-go city driving where their batteries are constantly being recharged. At freeway speeds, there is little opportunity for them to regenerate energy that can be used to offset the gasoline they consumer. And, in fact, many hybrids actually have lower highway mileage ratings than what the EPA estimates they get in city driving.

        While West declined to discuss the political ramifications, the new study could be used by proponents of increased fuel economy – and opponents of higher speed limits.  A vehicle that might get 40 miles per gallon at 50 miles an hour would see something closer to just 25 mpg at 80 mph.

        Highway speeds have risen significantly since Congress lifted federal restrictions first passed during the energy crises of the 1970s that, at one point lowered the maximum U.S. speed to 50 mph and then raised it to 55, the infamous “double-nickel.”

        Late last year, Texas opened the country’s fastest highway, a toll road stretch near Austin with a top speed of 85 mph.

        The increase in speeds has created havoc for both the EPA, which is mandated by Congress to oversee automotive fuel economy standards and testing, and the automakers depending on EPA results.

        The tests that determine the figures on a new vehicle’s window label, the so-called “Munroney Sticker” have been revised a number of times over the past four decades, most recently with the start of the 2012 model-year. The latest procedures include a brief burst at 80 miles per hour but the results generally reflect much less aggressive, low-speed driving, which means that a large percentage of American motorists will get lower fuel economy than indicated.

        And the faster they go, the new Oak Ridge study confirms, the faster the gap will grow.

        How to Care for Your Car

        Cheap Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice

        Best Extended Car Warranty

        Editor's Choice
        Recently Published

        The Inside Story of the 2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse

        Today
        2023 Honda CR-V hybrid production REL

        Honda’s Big Bet on Fuel-Cell Tech Doesn’t Stop with Passenger Cars

        Today
        2024 BMW X5 xDrive 50e - front 3-4 driving v2

        First Look: 2024 BMW X5 and X6

        Yesterday

        2 responses to “Pedal to the Metal? New Study Quantifies the Mileage You’ll Lose”

        1. ccweems says:
          January 28, 2013 at 12:49 pm

          It is not only cars that are more efficient at lower speeds, in fact most forms of mechanized transportation share the same attributes yet there are mute calls for train and planes to travel at more efficient speeds. The high speed trains require more than twice as much energy per passenger than existing trains. Much the same can be said of air travel. Turboprop aircraft travelling at 300mph use far less than half the fuel so similar sized turbofan powered craft flying at 500mph.

          It appears that there is general agreement on rail and air travel that the savings in time is worth the additional energy expenditure. Should car travel be held to another standard? I think not. Why can’t the politicians and dim witted pundits accept the fact that at with the current speed limits per capita traffic fatalities are a fraction of what they were and the improved powertrain designs are significantly reducing fuel consumption despite higher speed limits.

          Those brave enough to urge a return to the 55mph limit should argue similarly that trains and planes reduce their speeds to be intellectually consistent. Few would be willing to appear so foolish. Even fewer remember that the 55mph limit was chosen not for safety but to save energy. Many of the new cars today could travel at the noted 85mph and consume less gas than the Nixon era cars consumed at 55mph.

          Reply
          1. Paul A. Eisenstein says:
            January 28, 2013 at 10:16 pm

            Hi, CC,

            All valid points. It seems only when air transport speeds approaching the sound barrier are discussed does the issue of excess energy consumption come up. Most of the time, mass transit proponents are just pleased to get people out of cars and off the road.

            Clearly, we do need to consider the excess cost of reducing highway speeds in terms of slower shipping, lost manpower and, I would argue, the issue of driver fatigue. Crossing from Detroit to Chicago, for example, is an acceptable four hours today. But it topped five at 55, and the difference is enough, to lead to more cases of driver fatigue which, as we noted in a TDB story last week, is responsible for a high percentage of crashes.

            Paul A. Eisenstein
            Publisher, TheDetroitBureau.com

            Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2023
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: