• News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
  • News
  • Guides
  • Reviews
  • Media
  • About
Sign up Now (For Free)

Sign up for our newsletter and receive the latest automotive news in your inbox!

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
News
Read Now
  • All News
  • Automakers
  • Automobiles
  • Auto Shows
  • Business
  • EVs & Environment
  • Guides
  • Lawsuits/Legal
  • Regulatory
  • Ride-Sharing
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Technology
Recent
  • Get the Latest about New Cars, EVs and More with the Headlight News Podcast
  • Order Up! Tesla Opens Order Books for the Tesla Semi
  • Detroit Automakers Reinstating Mask Mandates as COVID Surges
  • BMW Offers Up Official “Spy Shots” of Plug-In XM SUV
  • Court-Appointed Monitor Sets Schedule for UAW Elections
  • The Rearview Mirror: The Car That Begat Automotive Safety Laws
  • Mercedes Issues “Do Not Drive” Recall for 292K Vehicles
  • Targeting Tesla, VW CEO Says EVs are More Profitable Than First Forecast
  • Toyota Cuts Profit Guidance as Costs Continue to Rise
  • Honda Adds a Sport Trim to Odyssey Line for New Model Year
Editor’s Choice
    Reviews
    Read Now
    • All Reviews
    • Classic Cars
    • Concept Cars
    • Convertibles
    • Coupes
    • Crossovers/CUVs
    • Diesel
    • Hot hatches
    • Hybrids
    • Luxury Vehicles
    • Minivans
    • Muscle Cars
    • Pickups
    • Sedans
    • Sports Cars
    • Super Cars
    • SUVs
    Recent Reviews
    • First Drive: 2022 Mercedes-Benz C 300
    • First Impression: 2023 Nissan Z
    • A Week With: 2022 Lexus LC 500 Convertible
    • A Week With: 2022 Ram 2500 Power Wagon Crew Cab
    • First Drive: 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning
    • First Drive(s): 2022 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate and AT4X
    • A Week With: 2022 BMW i4 M50
    • A Week With: 2022 Mazda CX-5
    • First Drive: 2023 Kia Sportage
    • First Drive: 2022 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe
    Editor’s Choice
      Guides
      Car Warranty
      • Endurance Warranty Reviews
      • BMW Extended Warranty
      • Extended Warranty For Cars Over 100k Miles
      • Extended Car Warranty Cost
      • Subaru Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Reviews
      • CarShield Cost
      • Aftermarket Car Warranty
      • CARCHEX Warranty Reviews
      • Reputable Extended Car Warranty Companies
      • Used Car Warranty Companies
      • Best Car Warranty
      • Is CarShield A Scam?
      • Mercedes Extended Warranty
      • CarShield Plans
      Insurance
      • How To Identify A Car Insurance Company
      • Geico Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • How Far Back Does A Car Insurance Company Look
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance For Used Cars
      • State Farm Mechanical Breakdown Insurance
      • Mechanical Breakdown Insurance From Progressive
      • Dollar A Day Insurance
      • Auto Insurance For SSI Recipients
      • Car Insurance Rates After A Suspended License
      • Auto Insurance For Salvage Vehicles
      • Average Cost of Dodge Ram 1500 Car Insurance
      • Car Insurance Florida
      • Full Coverage Auto Insurance
      • GrubHub Insurance
      • Amazon Delivery Auto Insurance
      Shipping
      • Car Shipping Companies
      • uShip Reviews
      • Auto Shipping From California To Hawaii
      • Montway Auto Transport Reviews
      • Cheap Car Shipping
      • Easy Auto Ship Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Miami
      • Auto Shipping To Alaska
      • Car Shipping Cost
      • Auto Shipping Hawaii
      • Auto Shipping Puerto Rico
      • Sherpa Auto Transport Reviews
      • Auto Shipping Atlanta
      • Auto Shipping Boston
      • Auto Shipping. Chicago
      About
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy Policy
      • Affiliate Disclosure
      • Sitemap
      TheDetroitBureau.com

      More than just “another” place to find news, reviews, spy shots, commentary, features, and guides about the auto industry. TheDetroitBureau doesn’t stop with the press releases or confuse a few lines of opinion with insightful, in-depth reporting.

      Contact Us

      Like what you see? Have some ideas for making The Detroit Bureau.com even better? Let us know, we’d love to hear your voice.

        Media
        Listen Now
        • Headlight News: All Episodes
        More from TheDetroitBureau
        • Guides
        • Latest News
        • Auto Reviews
        • Podcasts
        Headlight News

        TheDetroitBureau.com’s Headlight News offers a look at the past week’s top automotive news stories, as well as what’s coming up in the week ahead. Check out the week’s top story and our latest review…along with a dive into the past with this week in automotive history.

        home > news > Automobiles > Approval of Toyota Settlement Doesn’t End Unintended Acceleration Nightmare

        Approval of Toyota Settlement Doesn’t End Unintended Acceleration Nightmare

        Maker still faces potential billions in claims for injuries, deaths.

        Paul A. Eisenstein
        Paul A. Eisenstein , Publisher & Editor-in-Chief
        Dec. 31, 2012
        Will Toyota settle the remaining unintended acceleration cases to keep pictures like this crash scene out of the headlines?

        A federal judge in suburban Los Angeles has given his preliminary approval to a settlement estimated to be worth as much as $1.4 billion in a collection of cases involving the unintended acceleration of Toyota Motor Co. products – but the deal only resolves what one observer described as the “easy” part of the litigation facing the Japanese giant.

        If given the court’s final okay sometime next year, the agreement would resolve claims that the unintended acceleration problems led to a sharp decline in the value of Toyota vehicles.

        But it does not resolve scores of additional claims filed by those who allege they were injured during “runaway car” crashes or on behalf of others who were killed.

        Your News Source!

        The new Toyota settlement resolves “an economic value lawsuit,” stresses Joe Phillippi, of AutoTrends Consulting.  And while that may involve the majority of the lawsuits Toyota was facing, he notes it’s “the highly emotional lawsuits yet to be heard.  And when you start parading in front of a jury grizzly images of people injured or killed that makes for great headlines.”

        Since late 2009, Toyota has recalled more than 14 million vehicles due to unintended acceleration issues.  The maker, internal company documents later revealed, had initially resisted pressure to make repairs but shifted into gear after a widely-reported accident claimed the lives of a California Highway Patrol Officer and several family members.

        The first recall involved so-called carpet entrapment, where loose floor mats could inadvertently jam the accelerator pedal wide open. But early in 2010, Toyota added millions more vehicles because of potentially sticky accelerator assembles.

        The issue has continued to plague the maker, Toyota adding another 154,000 Lexus RX luxury crossovers to the list last July due to carpet entrapment problems. The delay in recalling those vehicles led to a record $17.4 million fine for the automaker – on top of $48.8 million the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration dunned the maker in 2010 for delaying recalls for unintended acceleration and other safety-related issues.

        The maker took a deep hit to sales in the immediate wake of the 2009 and 2010 announcements but has since regained most, if not all, of its marketplace momentum.  And clearly, the new settlement is designed to avoid further problems for a brand that has traditionally boasted a solid reputation for quality, reliability and safety.

        “Toyota seems to be putting this piece of the puzzle behind it (having recognized) the significant impact recalls can have on a brand,” says Mike Rozembajgier, Vice President of Recalls for Stericycle ExpertRECALL, a firm that helps large companies deal with recall issues.

        The agreement announced last Wednesday targets a specific group of lawsuits consolidated under the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California – cases involving claims that the recalls and subsequent publicity led to a loss of value for Toyota vehicle owners and lease customers.

        The maker will offer cash payments of about $250 million to eligible customers who sold or turned in leased vehicles between September 2009 and December 2010.  The maker also plans to expand warranty coverage for specific vehicle components that could be involved in unintended acceleration issues. It will retrofit 3.2 million vehicles with brake override systems that automatically reduce power once the brake is touched – even if the accelerator is also being pressed.

        And Toyota will use some of the remaining funds to expand safety research and conduct new driver education programs.

        The maker says it will take a one-time, $1.1 billion pre-tax charge against earnings – though Steve Berman, one of the lead plaintiffs attorneys, said his understanding is that the total value of the proposal is between $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion.

        “We are pleased that the court gave such swift preliminary approval of the settlement,” said Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, and co-lead counsel for Toyota owners and lessees in the case. “We are eager to move the process forward so we can ultimately distribute funds to Toyota owners as well as install brake-override systems in more than three million vehicles.”

        U.S. District Judge James Selna plans to hold a fairness hearing next year before issuing a final ruling on the settlement. But he has also scheduled hearings to begin in February on the wrongful death and injury lawsuits that could drag the unintended acceleration case back into the headlines.

        Toyota has settled some claims, notably from the estate of the California trooper and family members killed in the October 2009 crash. But the maker has also been battling other claimants. It has been particularly adamant in cases where the lawsuits point to mysterious electronic gremlins alleged to have caused Toyota products to race out of control unexpectedly.

        And the maker does have significant ammunition to back itself up: a pair of studies conducted on behalf of NHTSA by the National Academy of Sciences and by NASA found no such gremlins but did point to driver error as the likely cause of most unintended acceleration crashes.

        The question, says recall expert Rozembajgier, is whether Toyota could lose by winning these cases.

        Audi faced similar claims of mysterious problems in the unintended acceleration scandal that swirled around its once-popular Audi 5000 model back in the late 1980s. The maker adamantly insisted the issue was one of driver error – and though federal regulators ultimately agreed, the damage done to the brand was severe. Sales plunging, Audi nearly left the U.S. market in 1992 and is only now beginning to gain momentum on luxury market leaders like BMW and Mercedes-Benz.

        So, with one settlement in hand, Toyota has “got to balance whether they want the story to continue or to move on and protect themselves in the marketplace,” said Rozembajgier, perhaps by settling the remaining wrongful death cases as quickly and as quietly as possible to keep the gruesome trial photos out of the 24-hour news cycle.

        Recently Published
        Podcasts
        Headlight News Podcast Microphone

        Get the Latest about New Cars, EVs and More with the Headlight News Podcast

        Yesterday

        Order Up! Tesla Opens Order Books for the Tesla Semi

        Yesterday
        An employee in the body shop at Stellantis’ Detroit Assembly Complex – Mack plant inspects the body of a Jeep® Grand Cherokee L to ensure it is within specification before it goes to the paint shop. The Company invested $1.6 billion to repurpose two existing facilities and build a paint shop to create the first new assembly plant in Detroit in 30 years and bring 3,850 new jobs to the city.

        Detroit Automakers Reinstating Mask Mandates as COVID Surges

        Yesterday

        4 responses to “Approval of Toyota Settlement Doesn’t End Unintended Acceleration Nightmare”

        1. Jorge M. says:
          January 2, 2013 at 10:15 am

          Unfortunately in America siren chasers encourage people to sue big corporations even when their suit has no merit. It’s all designed to line the pockets of paid liars. It really is criminal and only exists in the U.S. Other countries don’t allow such nonsense and abuse of the judicial system for profit.

          Reply
          1. Paul A. Eisenstein says:
            January 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm

            Hi, Jorge,

            I hear you…though I am reluctant to endorse some of the wholesale torte reform steps taken in a few states. While industry (beyond autos) often face abusive litigation they are also driven to be more careful and aware of their actions. One of the examples often used as the supposed poster case for abusive litigation involved the elderly woman who sued McDonalds when coffee in a cup in her lap spilled and burned her. The 9-figure judgment no doubt was excessive — AND was scaled back upon appeal, as usually happens.

            But here’s the REAL story, which is actually why the suit is a poster case FOR the ability to sue corporations: the judgment was so huge because of what the jury learned. McDonalds used a high-pressure coffeemaking system that heated the brew to absurd temperatures, allowing a restaurant to produce more coffee with less equipment. But it not only produced a foul brew but also one that was hot enough to give serious burns. (She suffered 3rd degree burns, far beyond the normal scalding hot coffee might yield.) The company had received 100s, if not 1000s, of complaints from customers AND from franchisees. And its internal documents revealed management KNEW it was causing burns and injuries but weighed those injuries and potential litigation against higher costs and voted against the consumer. It was only after losing more than it forecast that it came up with a new system. Oh, and that now produces what I am told is pretty good coffee…(I don’t drink the stuff)…so consumers won on both ends.

            Paul E.

            Reply
        2. EllaAramyan says:
          January 3, 2013 at 7:37 pm

          It is sad how to this day Toyota is ignoring this problem while denying and refusing to fix it when people go to dealerships and claim unintended acceleration. Here is a good peice on that problem:

          http://lemonlawandlawyers.com/toyota-bullies-consumers-and-automatically-denies-lemon-law-claims-for-unintended-acceleration/

          🙁

          Reply
          1. Paul A. Eisenstein says:
            January 4, 2013 at 7:53 am

            This issue is likely to drag out for quite some time, Ella.

            Paul E.

            Reply

        Leave a Reply Cancel reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

        Share this article:
        © The Detroit Bureau 2022
        • Guides
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms of Use
        • Affiliate Disclosure
        • Contact Us
        • Sitemap
        Follow Us: