Posts Tagged ‘steve rattner’

Marchionne: Chrysler Rushing New, Fiat-Based Models to Market

CEO believes U.S. maker on track to beat 2010 targets; IPO could be coming.

by Paul A. Eisenstein on May.11, 2010

Chrysler/Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne wants to rush more product into U.S. showrooms ASAP.

Desperately short of new product, Chrysler may get a helping hand from Italian partner Fiat sooner than originally planned, according to the man who heads both companies.

Several compact-based Fiats could be on the market by the end of the 2011 calendar year, said Chairman and CEO Sergio Marchionne, in a conference call.

Meanwhile, said the Canadian-educated Marchionne, Chrysler is on target to beat its financial targets for this year, which could make it possible to push for an IPO, or public stock offering, “as quickly as we can.”

After a series of significant setbacks, Chrysler has been reporting a smattering of positive news, including an unexpected first-quarter operating profit of $143 million and an April sales increase that was the maker’s biggest year-over-year gain since 2005.

http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/about/subscribe

Sign Up...It's Free!

But analysts contend that the maker still needs an infusion of new models to truly move ahead.  The plan calls for relatively little in the coming months, though the replacement for the Grand Cherokee is considered a first critical step.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Jay Leno May Have Moved On. Ralph Nader Hasn’t

Nader injects himself into the debate over the future of General Motors and other automakers.

by Joseph Szczesny on May.19, 2009

Ralph Nader, courtesy of the Nader for Presdent Campaign

Ralph Nader is still running for office.

In a letter to Senator Chris Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank consumer advocate Ralph Nader called on the Senate and House banking committees to hold “thorough” hearings to protect taxpayers’ investments and to seek answers to several questions about President Barack Obama’s Auto Task Force. Nader wants to know:

– Is the Task Force right in pushing for elimination of as many brands, as it has demanded?

– Is the Task Force asking for too many plants to close?

– Do GM and Chrysler really need to close as many dealerships as announced?

– Is the logic of closing dealers to enable the remaining dealers to charge higher prices; and if so, why is the government facilitating such a move?

– Is it reasonable and fair for GM to impose liability for disposing of unsold cars on dealers with which it severs relations, as Chrysler has apparently done?

– Has the Task Force evaluated the social ripple effects on suppliers, innovation, dealers, newspapers, banks and others that hold company stock and/or are company creditors, and other unique harms that might stem from bankruptcy?    (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

New GM CEO Confirms More Cuts Are Coming

Fritz Henderson vows to get the job done "in or out of court."

by Ken Zino on Mar.31, 2009

The aura of confidence projected by Henderson belies the enormity of the task in front of him.

An aura of confidence projected by Henderson belies the enormity of the task in front of him.

General Motors CEO Fritz Henderson in his second day on the job held a news conference that reaffirmed his commitment to “go deeper and go faster” in preparing a revised viability plan with “a clean balance sheet” that will pass muster with the President’s Auto Task Force. If not, Henderson said “we will do it in court.”

He acknowledged the sweeping criticisms of the President and the U.S. Treasury Department as “painful,” but quickly added that “we got it” and sketched in broad outlines the areas of the strategy that need improvement by June first. 

More job cuts and plant closings will be required, and bondholders and retirees will see commitments made to them by GM trimmed or eliminated. The decision on the sale or closing of Hummer will be made shortly. Saturn’s future remains in doubt beyond 2011, but Henderson said that it is still being studied with no immediate need to take action. Few details emerged, as Henderson said he was not going to conduct negotiations in public that are properly done at the bargaining table. 

Henderson also claimed not to be concerned about his own future beyond 60 days, “I don’t really worry too much about that,” he said. “If we get our job done it’s going to be okay,” he added. In a press briefing yesterday, Robert Gibbs, the President’s Press Secretary, denied that Rick Wagoner’s resignation as GM’s chairman was a quid pro quo for the continuation of aid. He also refused to speculate on what happens to Henderson or GM beyond the current 60-day deadline. 

Treasury is in the process of appointing two directors to the board of General Motors Acceptance Corporation, and is expected to have a significant, if not dominant role, in the remaking of the GM board of directors so that a majority of its members are new by the August meeting. Henderson now has the unenviable task of reporting to two constituencies – the changing GM board, with its new interim chairman, Kent Kresa, and Treasury through its Auto Task Force, headed by Steve Rattner and Ron Bloom. Treasury continues to be involved with any GM decisions that involve taxpayer funding on a “daily basis.”

Henderson said that the need for further cash is being evaluated, and would not say how much more liquidity from U.S. taxpayers would be needed during the next two months. The need for the $2 billion in support that was skipped in March and the $2.6 billion requested for April are still being evaluated. He would not say when taxpayers could expect to see repayment of the loans.

The aura of confidence projected by Henderson during his first leading role belies the enormity of the labors in front of him and his management team that has careened and crashed through an unending series of emergencies.  Henderson worked for virtually his entire career for Rick Wagoner, and he did not really say what would be different now that he is boss in spite of multiple questions on the topic.

Perhaps the biggest issue in getting through the next two months is the core problem of fleeing customers. It’s lights out, if an even worse sales collapse occurs than GM is currently enduring as car buyers shun its brands. The President’s warranty program announced yesterday will be of some, as yet unknown, help. GM also announced — just prior to Henderson speaking — that it will start a plan called “GM Total Confidence,” that it says protects a customer’s paycheck, investment and vehicle for 24 months.  (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Detroit Struggling to Win Over Auto Task Force

McCain, GOP leaders demand bankruptcy for GM, Chrysler.

by Paul A. Eisenstein on Mar.09, 2009

Nardelli to meet with task force leaders, hoping to forestall bankruptcy demanded by McCain, others in the GOP.

Nardelli is to meet with the auto task force, hoping to forestall the bankruptcy demanded by Senator John McCain, and others in the GOP.

Forget what you’ve heard about the GOP being the “party of business,” unless you believe that bankruptcy is the best way to save American manufacturing.  A chorus of Senate Republicans is calling for the Obama Administration to let General Motors Corp. and Chrysler go bankrupt, rather than handing out billions of dollars in additional aid.

That’s a very real possibility, though the Administration has yet to take a definitive stand.  For the moment, it continues pressing the troubled Detroit makers to work up their final viability plan, which is due in Washington on March 31st.  Meanwhile, lead members of the White House’s automotive task force – Wall Street fund manager Steve Rattner and restructuring expert Ron Bloom — will be spending the day in the Motor City, meeting with GM and Chrysler executives, as well as Ron Gettelfinger, president of the United Auto Workers.

Among the most vocal opponents of additional aid is the defeated GOP presidential candidate and Arizona Senator John McCain, who declared, on Fox News Sunday, “The best thing that could probably happen to General Motors, in my view, is they go into Chapter 11.”

Even some Democrats have begun to argue that the only way to resolve the domestic auto industry’s problems would be a court-ordered restructuring, in which significant changes to outstanding debt could be mandated.  The UAW’s existing contract would also come up for review and a bankruptcy overseer would have the ability to declare the agreement void, as happened with Delphi Corp., which last year halved the pay of its union workers and, more recently, got the court okay to slash retiree health care benefits.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark