Detroit Bureau on Twitter

Posts Tagged ‘trial lawyers’

Book Review: Feeding Frenzy

An inside look at the Firestone Tire crisis at Ford Motor.

by on Jan.04, 2010

An unsavory look at how the media sausage is made.

This is a cautionary tale about how two old-line industrial companies were caught out in a global media crisis that badly tarnished the reputations of both. By the time that trial lawyers, politicians and the media moved on to other matters (prompted by the contested Bush presidential election in Florida that went all the way to the Supreme Court), Ford Motor Company and Firestone were shaken to their engineering roots and their business practices drastically altered — for a time, at least.

Feeding Frenzy-Trial lawyers, the media, politicians and corporate adversaries: Inside the Ford-Firestone crisis, by Jon Harmon, is a well-written first-hand account of the Firestone tire Recall and the Ford Explorer, which used a majority of the defective tires.

And, before you read further, be aware that Jon and I worked together at Ford on the crisis. It was the most challenging time of my life as a communicator, as a bureaucratic and opportunistic corporate culture was confronted with much faster moving and unethical adversaries, notably trial lawyers and their water carriers in the media. So beware of book reviews by friends of the author.

It is not that Jon needs a friend to review this book, though. It stands alone quite well as an inside view of the crisis, while serving as an entertaining platform for Jon’s strongly held, battle tested, beliefs on corporate crisis management. Read as such, it is worth the time. See Jon’s site by clicking here.


The real human tragedy behind this crisis is that more than 370 people are dead, and countless others seriously injured.


The answer is distressingly simple, though the causes are complex and arguable:

  • The Ford Explorer sport utility vehicle of the period, like other sport utility vehicles then without electronic chassis controls, could roll over if driver control was lost.
  • Compounding this inherent design problem of this high center of gravity vehicle was a marketing success story. It was the best selling SUV ever. The Explorer had become tremendously popular, with two plants working overtime for years to keep up with demand. Millions of them were on the road, with hundreds of thousands added annually when the scandal came to widespread public attention. Even this might have been okay, if a third decisive factor had not appeared.
  • Ford had asked Firestone to supply a tire that looked like a “tough truck” tire with its blocky tread, but wanted it built for reasons of cost and comfort on a passenger tire carcass. As the tires aged, the tread separated from the tire because of design and manufacturing defects leaving an inflated shell. In effect, the driver was confronted with a yawing motion with the Explorer behaving as if it was suddenly on glare ice. Not all of the drivers or their passengers survived such incidents.


Treasury Department Continues Maneuvering to Get General Motors out of Bankruptcy Court

A series of compromises are designed to quash objections and allow the New GM to emerge by summer's end.

by on Jun.29, 2009

Treasury Auto Task Force, Ron Bloom

How other groups fare as the case moves forward appears to be directly related to the threat they pose to the Treasury plan.

As the summer heats up, so is opposition to the proposed reorganization of GM by multiple groups who claim they are not being treated fairly. And since for every action there is a reaction, The U.S. Treasury Department is stepping up its maneuvering to keep its GM plan on track.

The latest such choreography saw trial lawyers receive a handsome sop over the weekend when GM agreed to allow product liability suits to continue on pre-bankruptcy GM vehicles, as TDB has reported.

Not only are the trial lawyers large contributors to the Democratic Party, who have resisted reforms to a system that sees most of the victim’s compensation redistributed to lawyers’ fees, but they represented a potentially massive roadblock to a quick emergence from bankruptcy for GM.

How other groups affected by GM fare as the case moves forward appears to be directly related to the threat they pose to the Treasury plan to do a so called section 363 sale that will preserve some of GM instead of liquidating all of it.

As in the Chrysler case, the strongest argument for this government plan is that more is saved and more – but not all — parties benefit from a quick resumption of business and the trimming back or elimination of as many liabilities as possible from the New GM. The argument also leaves room, as has now been demonstrated, for some political deals that change the terms of the two cases.

Delete this copy after inserting to retain outline box as in photos

In an earlier move less than three weeks after GM declared bankruptcy, Treasury rejected the request for additional funds for suppliers who are strapped because of the GM meltdown and cessation of production at virtually all of its North American plants.