Mercury’s surprisingly high rating — fourth after Buick-Jaguar, Lexus and Toyota — in the just-announced J. D. Power vehicle dependability survey gave a needed boost to Ford Motor Company’s traditional “medium price” brand.
Beginning a couple of years ago, financial analysts and many automotive writers were pronouncing the demise of the Mercury brand. The death sentence was furthered by Vegas investor Kerkorian’s ambassador to Detroit, Jerry York, who told the media that Ford Motor Company should “sell off” Mercury.
If correctly quoted, York should have known better, because unlike the Wall Street analysts and most auto writers, he had considerable Detroit experience. One wisecrack by a Motor City vet put it this way: “Everything analysts know about the auto industry, they’ve learned from riding in New York City taxicabs.”
York’s statement made no sense whatsoever because there was nothing to sell but the brand name, which was hardly the most sought-after following years of neglect and mis-direction by the Dearborn automaker. Mercury, once a stand-alone make established by the Ford Company in 1938, was integrated into corporate planning, engineering, purchasing, and powertrain and assembly production 50 years ago. Unlike a Jaguar or Land Rover or even Volvo, there are no Mercury assets for someone to buy outside the name. Mercurys are retailed by Lincoln-Mercury dealers except in rural areas and small towns where they are sold by Ford-Mercury or Ford-Lincoln-Mercury dealers. (more…)